[Note this blogpost is a continuation of “What is Voice Movement Therapy?” Part 1. Please read Part 1 first.]
It was Freud who demonstrated through the development and practice of psychoanalysis that the psychological health of an individual depended in large part on his ability to express feelings through the voice. Freud derived this idea of the cathartic method from Greek tragedy where the aim was to purge feelings of pity and terror in order to discharge psychic stress. However, he made one major change: he believed that words could be substituted for deeds and that the process of abreaction – the ideal expenditure of energy in response to a past event in order to return a person to a state of psychological balance – could be achieved by words alone if those words were uttered with great affect. While this method has proven helpful to many individuals, it has not served others who, for various reasons, need a more embodied connection to the workings of the mind. In the development of his “talking cure,” Freud did not carry his notions of the voice further.
In developing his work, Carl Jung recognized that what he identified as complexes – those unconscious networks of sense impressions, images and ideas which we associate with the emotional tone of our own body – could be heard in the acoustic tones of voice. He discovered in the disintegrating speech patterns of people suffering from schizophrenia that the pitches and qualities of vocal tone could express the affective nucleus of a complex. However, he did not carry this line of investigation further, but concentrated his active imagination and other techniques primarily on visual images. BUT, his concepts of anima and animus, of the male and female parts contained in each of our psyches, and the way of working he developed which he called Active Imagination, had a lasting impact on the experimental voicework that followed and on Voice Movement Therapy, as well.
The first recognized body-centered psychotherapist, Wilhelm Reich, used voicing and breathing as a way of achieving release from the muscular body armouring which he demonstrated absorbed and held in check the dammed-up energies of repressed feelings. By extending and deepening restricted patterns of breath with hands-on Massage, Manipulation and Compression, he was able to release pent-up emotions through screams, sobs and sighs, which helped to break up the muscular body blocks inhibiting the organism’s ability to change and grow. His student Alexander Lowen determined that the quality of voice often mirrored the nature of the underlying repressed emotions, declaring that the impeding of the body’s innate malleability was the curse of Western civilization. Both men were working with the disconnection between body and mind which they found in their clients.
The voice, located between brain and body and capable of conveying both ideas, through words, and physical sensation, through vibration, was ideally suited to provide a vehicle to strengthen the body/mind connection, but that didn’t happen. In fact, none of these pioneers developed a system for prioritizing the voice itself as a therapeutic modality. It took a medical man who was neither a psychologist nor a neurologist to begin developing this connection.
Dr, Paul Moses, MD, the Ear, Nose and Throat specialist who championed Wolfsohn, believed that the success of any vocal and psychological therapy depended on giving voice to those ideas and feelings for which words were inadequate. This was precisely what Brook, Artaud, Hart and Grotowski were trying to do in their theatre work by helping actors to remove personal inhibitions which prevented the physical and vocal expression of psychological material – in a process akin to psychotherapy. Moses believed that the sounds of language – what Newham later identified as ten vocal components – comprised an emotional communication as important as words and could reveal psychic images of personal and collective significance: what we now view as archetypes and subpersonalities.
Newham: Investigating a synthesis of voicework and therapy
In response to these psychological and theatrical investigations of the 1940’s through ‘60’s, Paul Newham felt the need to synthesize and create from diverse disciplines a true ‘psychotherapy of singing.” In his book, The Singing Cure, he traced lines of development in several different areas in the use of the voice for expression and communication: In all these, he noted the shadow of the unspoken and unsounded – and how roots of the body/mind split could be traced both to the development of speech in the evolution of humankind and to the developmental process of each individual child learning to talk.
Evolution of speech
Human speech developed from a kind of vocal and gestural song and dance – a kind of proto-language which could NOT express an event, object, element or feeling without embodying it. Over centuries, language progressed to increasingly abstract speech in which vocal symbols alone, without the direct sensory engagement of the speaker, could convey a message. This advance created great clarity in the articulation of ideas and the ability to reason and describe. However, it also created a separation, or disconnection, between the natural world and the sensing and responding bodily self – one of the factors in the formation of the shadow that contributed to what we recognize as a split between mind and body.
Developmental process of learning to speak
This evolutionary process was paralleled by the universal developmental acquisition of speech and language by children who gradually have to give up spontaneous sound-making in order to learn the rules of the code needed to function in an increasingly complex society. To do this, they have to give up the sensuous oral delight of unrestricted sound-making and the compelling power of vocalization without words to command attention from parents and others. They also become subjected to judgment: a word is the right word or it is wrong; its pronunciation is correct or it is not. Many vocal problems have had their beginning during this formative time and it also often plays a part in the dilemma of singers who can vocalize freely but become tense and constricted the moment they must add words to their vocalizations, especially within the fixed structure of song. Much of the craft of learning to sing within the formalized structure of a song involves a process of losing and finding again that spontaneous voice.
Losing and finding the spontaneous voice
As Newham recounted it, in the evolution of singing from the primordial voice-dances of our ancestors and the use of the voice in ancient Greek tragedy to promote healing in both actor and audience by inducing catharsis – the same effect Freud sought in his “talking cure” – the voice lost much of both its curative and its expressive potential. In large part, this was because of two widespread, culturally imposed forms of judgment:
1. The triumph of an aesthetics of “good” and “bad,” acceptable and unacceptable, as determined by the Christian church in its quest for ever more light to banish the shadows, and more light, to banish all shadows;
2. A classical style of singing that evolved to favor a clear and seamless vocal line produced in one of four basic categories determined by pitch, range and certain qualities and combinations of sound.
A problem with banishing shadows in favor of light, of smoothing out ragged edges to make seamlessly beautiful sound, is that it can sometimes impoverish itself and limit the presence of contraries by which to change and grow. As Wolfsohn said,
“The psychological concept of the shadow corresponds to the aesthetic concept of ugliness. The beauty of the dared expression is that only in encountering and overcoming the dark side of oneself can one achieve true artistic expression, uniting all aspects of the self in order to feel whole and encounter others.” (Wolfsohn, unpublished notes, Marita Gunther)
In other words, a sunset is not a sunset without its illumination by the coming darkness. In the second half of The Singing Cure, Newham outlined his system for a true psychotherapy of the voice which could work with extremes on a continuum.
[This blog article continues in “What is Voice Movement Therapy?” Part 3.]
By Anne M. Brownell, VTMR
Copyright 2000 and 2018 by Anne M. Brownell . All rights reserved.